GroEL Example:

Here we present EMatch results on a groELcryoEM map at 6A resulotion. First, 168 were detected. Then, we performed two experimenats. In the first experiment the spatial arrangement
of the EM helices is used to locate the three given domains in the complex. In the second experiment, we assumed that the high resolution structures of the three domains are unavailable, but structural homologues do exist in a predefined dataset. We queried a dataset of 1538 SCOP superfamily representatives and ranked the best alignments of the representatives according to statistical scores. The following tables present for each domain its best alignment in the complex compared with EMatch (colored structure) compared with the reference structure of the solved groEL crystal structure (gray).




A-Priori Known Domain Reconstruction


Equatorial Domain
Apical Domain
Intermediate Domain



Transformation:
  -0.134784    0.094350 0.876417
  26.898291 36.105854 0.687021
Transformation:
   0.050619   0.173110     2.496452
-27.880394 13.133262 -4.326988
Transformation:
 0.046926    0.249362 -0.564381
 8.574684 -36.907040 -4.828737

detailed information
detailed information detailed information






A-Priori Unknown Domain Reconstruction


Equatorial Domain
Apical Domain
Intermediate Domain



Transformation:
    0.317645   0.067196 -0.415939
-2.252899 -5.018789 -19.492180
 
Transformation:
  -1.315308 -0.114314 2.146134
-67.344917 -41.352161 -12.307427

Transformation:
3.062486 0.050903 0.067192
-103.740242 78.463303 -15.128771

detailed information
detailed information detailed information
top ranked fold compared
to the SCOP representatives dataset
second ranked fold compared
to the SCOP representatives dataset
4th ranked fold compared
to the SCOP representatives dataset